Original Article

Conservation Priorities for Indian Goat Breeds Based on Microsatellite and Analytical Data

Year: 2020 | Month: June | Volume 10 | Issue 3

References (26)

1.Anonymous, breed wise information published by Indian J. Anim. Sci., pp. 77-83.

View at Google Scholar

2.Bennewitz, J., Eding H., Ruane, J. and Simianer, H. 2007. Strategies for moving from conservation to utilization. In: K. Oldenbroek, ed. Utilization and conservation of farm animal genetic resources. 131–146. Wageningen, the Netherlands, Wageningen Academic Publishers.

View at Google Scholar

3.Boettcher, P., Tixier-Boichard, M., Toro, M.A., Simianer, H., Eding, H., Gandini, G., Joost, S., Garcia, D., Colli, L., Ajmone-Marsan, P. and Globaldiv Consortium, 2010. Objectives, criteria and methods for using molecular genetic data in priority setting for conservation of animal genetic resources. Anim. Genet., 41: 64–77.

View at Google Scholar

4.Carson, A., Elliott, Groom. J., Winter. A. and Bowles, D. 2009. Geographical isolation of native sheep breeds in the U.K evidence of endemism as a risk factor to genetic resources. Livest. Sci., 123(2-3): 288–299.

View at Google Scholar

5.Cervantes, I., Pastor, J. M., Gutierrez, J.P., Goyache, F. and Molina, A. 2011. Computing effective population size from molecular data: The case of three rare Spanish ruminant populations. Livest. Sci., 138: 202–206.

View at Google Scholar

6.Cuc, N.T.K., Weigend, S., Tieu, H.V. and Simianer, H. 2011. Conservation priorities and optimum allocation of conservation funds for Vietnamese local chicken breeds. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 128: 284–294.

View at Google Scholar

7.DADF, 2014, 19th Livestock Census 2012. All India Report published by Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

8.DADF, 2015. Estimated Livestock Population Breed-wise based on Breed Survey, 2013. Published by Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

9.FAO, 2000. World watch list for domestic animal diversity, 3rd ed., Rome, 2000, http://www.fao.org/dad-is/.

View at Google Scholar

10.FAO, 2013. In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. FAO, Animal Production and Health Guidelines. No. 14. Rome.

View at Google Scholar

11.Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Addison-Wesley.

View at Google Scholar

12.Gandini, G., Ollivier, L., Danell, B., Distl, O., Georgoudis, A., Groeneveld, E., Martyniuk, E., Van Arendonk, J.A.M. and Wolliams, J.A. 2004. Criteria to assess the degree of endangerment of livestock breeds in Europe. Livest. Prod. Sci., 91: 173–182.

View at Google Scholar

13.Gizaw, S., Komen, H., Windig, J.J., Hanotte, O. and Van Arendonk, J.A.M. 2008. Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity. Genet. Sel. Evol., 40: 433–447.

View at Google Scholar

14.Hill, W.G. 1981. Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Res., 38: 209–216.

View at Google Scholar

15.Leroy, G., Verrier, E., Meriaux, J.C. and Rognon, X. 2009. Genetic diversity of dog breeds: between-breed diversity, breed assignation and conservation approaches. Anim. Genet., 40(3): 333-343

View at Google Scholar

16.Meuwissen, T.H.E. 2009. Towards consensus on how to measure neutral genetic diversity? J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 126: 333– 334.

View at Google Scholar

17.Monomorph breed wise no. 11, 14, 29, 42, 57, 58, 60, 64, 67, 75, 76 published by National Bureau of Animal Genetics Resources, Karnal-132001.

View at Google Scholar

18.Network project reports on Animal genetic resource published by National Bureau of Animal Genetics Resources, Karnal-132001.

View at Google Scholar

19.NATP project reports on Animal Genetic Resource published by ICAR, New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

20.Pinent, Tamina. 2009. Concept for planning conservation schemes for farm animal genetic diversity focused on German chicken breeds. Thesis submitted to Gottingen Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology.

View at Google Scholar

21.Ruane, J. 1999. A critical review of the value of genetic distances in conservation of animal genetic resources. J. Anim. Breed Genet., 116: 317–323.

View at Google Scholar

22.Reist-Marti, S.B., Simianer, H., Gibson, J., Hanotte, O. and Rege, J.E.O. 2003. Weitzman’s approach and conservation of breed diversity: an application to African Cattle breeds. Conserv. Biol., 17(5): 1299–1311.

View at Google Scholar

23.Waples, R.S. 2006. A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv. Genet., 7: 167–184.

View at Google Scholar

24.Waples, R.S. and Do, C. 2008. LdNe: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 8: 753–756.

View at Google Scholar

25.Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genet., 16: 97–159.

View at Google Scholar

26.Zander, K.K., Drucker, A.G., Holm-Müller, K. and Simianer, H. 2009. Choosing the “cargo” for Noah’s Ark –applying the Metrick-Weitzman theorem to Borana cattle. Ecol. Econ., 68: 2051–2057.

View at Google Scholar

Economic Affairs, Quarterly Journal of Economics| In Association with AESSRA

26904169 - Visitors since February 20, 2019